Daytradefeed

No In-built rules. Play any card games

https://www.anycard.games/

Sponsored by: www.anycard.games No In-built rules. Play any card games just like holding cards in your hand with upto 10 players online!! Free to join and free joining in-game cash Bonus for limited time!!

NASDAQTrader.com

Fresh off the Blog – Warrior Trading

INO.com Trader's Blog

Blog – Simpler Trading

Blog – Option Alpha

– Tradingsim

Friday, January 30, 2015

Small-scale LNG projects in British Columbia nudge ahead



Financial Post - Top Stories http://ift.tt/1ze5U3g

Small-scale liquefied natural gas projects are emerging as bright spots in British Columbia’s bid to become a major exporter of natural gas, with two floating projects on the Canadian province’s Pacific Coast moving ahead even as larger projects face delays.


The Douglas Channel LNG project, an early frontrunner that was stalled when one of its owners fell into bankruptcy, looks to be back on course after a consortium led by Calgary’s Altagas Ltd officially took control on Wednesday.


The group, which also includes Belgium’s Exmar, France’s Electricite de France and Japan’s Idemitsu Kosan, hopes to make a final investment decision on the 550,000-tonne per annum (TPA) floating facility by yearend, with first exports in 2018.


“We do believe it could be the first LNG exporter off of the B.C. coast,” Altagas director of finance Jess Nieukerk told Reuters on Thursday, adding Altagas will keep working with Idemitsu on another, larger, LNG export project called Triton.


The Woodfibre LNG project, meanwhile, entered its 180-day environmental review phase this month, setting the stage for a final decision later this year on the 2 million TPA terminal, which is backed by Indonesian billionaire Sukanto Tanoto’s RGE Group.


The two floating projects are relatively small compared with mega-developments being contemplated by companies such as Malaysia’s Petronas and Chevron Corp, but lower capital costs mean their owners can move more quickly.


Woodfibre’s floating facility, for example, is expected to cost roughly $1.6-billion, while the Douglas Channel project is pegged at $600-million, compared with $11-billion for Petronas’ Pacific NorthWest LNG terminal.


Petronas delayed a final decision on its 12 million TPA project in December, citing high costs and the impact of low oil prices on company revenues.


BG Group, which is developing an LNG project in Prince Rupert, also pushed back a final decision on its 21 million TPA project last year and has said it now expects first exports in the next decade.


Chevron’s Kitimat LNG terminal, meanwhile, has been slowed by partner Apache’s exit from the 10 million TPA project. Apache agreed in December to sell its stake in the development to Australia’s Woodside Petroleum.


While 18 LNG export terminals have been proposed for the British Columbia coast, analysts say tough competition and the impact of falling oil prices mean it’s likely just a handful will ultimately go ahead.


© Thomson Reuters 2015





No comments:

Post a Comment